Thursday, July 31, 2025

Silent Erasure: The Mystery Behind Bihar’s Missing Voters

 


Silent Erasure: The Mystery Behind Bihar’s Missing Voters

A quiet storm is brewing in Bihar.


Thousands—possibly lakhs—of names have mysteriously disappeared from the state’s electoral rolls over the past several months. While the Election Commission (EC) has maintained that this is part of a routine rationalization effort, a growing chorus of voices across political, civil, and academic circles is raising alarm: was this “clean-up” really about electoral hygiene—or political calculus?

A Shadow Campaign and a Silent Verdict

According to several well-placed political sources, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) launched an internal outreach campaign sometime in 2023–24 aimed at gauging its support among migrant workers originally from Bihar. Party workers and affiliates were dispatched to major migration hubs like Mumbai, Surat, Delhi, and Ludhiana to speak with Bihari workers—many of whom had left their home state in search of work.


Though the findings of this outreach were never officially released, insiders claim that the sentiment among the migrants was largely anti-incumbent. Disillusioned by poor job creation, stagnating rural infrastructure, and inflation, many reportedly expressed dissatisfaction with the party—especially in the context of their lives back home.

Names Removed, Voices Silenced

In early 2025, the Election Commission initiated a mass update of the voter rolls in Bihar, citing the need to remove deceased voters, duplicates, and those who no longer reside in the constituency. However, the timing—and the pattern—of the deletions has raised serious eyebrows.


Multiple districts saw a sharp drop in voter numbers. In many cases, entire families of migrant workers—still very much alive—were removed from the rolls. Most of them, working far away in other states, were unaware of the revisions or unable to return in time to contest their deletion.


“Everyone knew they wouldn’t come back just to fill a form. Paapi pet ka sawaal hai,”

 “This wasn’t just voter roll revision—it was selective disenfranchisement.”

Political Motives or Administrative Routine?

Opposition parties have seized on the issue, alleging that the deletions were politically motivated.

“This is an engineered disappearance of voters who don’t support the BJP,” said Tejashwi Yadav of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD). “They knew migrant workers would vote against them—and they decided to quietly erase them from democracy itself.”

Congress and CPI(M) leaders have joined the call for an independent investigation, demanding transparency from the EC and restoration of legitimate voter names.

In contrast, BJP leaders have firmly denied any political role, calling the exercise “a necessary administrative update.” One party spokesperson stated: “The Election Commission is an independent body. These changes are in line with standard procedures.”

The EC’s Silence Fuels Suspicion

So far, the Election Commission has not provided any public district-wise breakdown or methodology to explain the deletions. RTI queries filed by journalists and activists have either gone unanswered or been met with vague replies citing “routine roll correction protocols.”

Former Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi, speaking at a panel earlier this month, voiced concern. “Disenfranchising working-class citizens simply because they’re not physically present is a gross misuse of the law,” he said. “The right to vote cannot be quietly revoked.”

Migrants: The Invisible Electorate

Bihar’s political landscape has long been shaped by migration. With an estimated 30–35% of working-age men employed outside the state, any election without their participation skews the democratic balance.

“Voting rights are not conditional on where you sleep at night,” said Meena Singh, a researcher at the Centre for Policy Research. “Yet the system is effectively punishing the poor for migrating in search of survival.”


For many affected families, the erasure has real consequences. Not only are they cut out of the political process, but they also face difficulties in accessing welfare schemes and government services that depend on valid ID linkage.

What Comes Next?

With elections on the horizon, the mystery of Bihar’s missing voters is unlikely to fade quietly. Activists are mobilizing to document cases and challenge the deletions legally, while opposition parties are planning mass awareness drives to ensure migrant workers reclaim their place on the rolls.


For now, however, one truth is unavoidable: a significant section of Bihar’s electorate has been silenced—not by vote, but by vanishing ink.

If you or someone you know has been removed from the electoral rolls without notice, contact your local election office or visit ECI’s official portal to check your status.

Monday, August 03, 2015

Agile and the Lean Team : And how not to spoil it?

I have been working on this for quite sometime and have seen people change from waterfall to Agile. Of course agile does not mean anarchy, which many people still think but when we start spoiling the entire essence of Agile?

Large Agile Team

That itself is a myth. There is nothing called as large agile team. Whether you have a Agile team or you don't have a Agile team. What do people mean by Large team then? A 50-60 member team? Might be, but is it even possible? I don't think so !

A 50-60 member Agile team will actually become an anarchy, in real terms.

So what next?

Agile Team has to be Lean

        Whether you call it Lean Agile or Just Agile actually it does not make any difference. But for     Agile to be really effective a Team size cannot be more than 12. Its all about the rules like not more 2 people can ride on a bike and 3 is a "Crowd". Same way more than 12 in an Agile team is actually a "Crowd". And do you really think crowd can give you any results in a way you would need. Nah ! they have their own Rules, They do not listen to anyone !

Dedicated Team

In the information age corporations have started thinking how they can structure their teams and from big hierarchical departments to small Agile teams makes a lot of sense. But what happens on the way, corporations take up more projects than they can staff and the universal solution that they get, which is more of traditional, is share the staffs in multiple projects. But imagine when a player is playing from both sides in a cricket match. Will you trust him?

Trust is all that you need !

Trust me, Trust, Focus and empowerment is the main aspect of having a successful team and it is very hard to have one when someone is not focussed on what he needs to achieve.

Trust comes from dedicated and empowered team with freedom to express their opinion without the fear of persecution. When they are scared they cannot innovate and you never get a insightful design but rather one designed in dark.

Empowerment !


Ok, Now comes the biggest one. Empowerment , this can just break or make your project. If you don't want to empower your Agile Team, Be ready make yourself available at anytime they need, Else they will keep waiting for you without doing anything and wait. That makes them completely handicapped and definitely project is nowhere going to see the light.

Overall Agile is cultural change, Whether you call it Scrum or Lean it's all the same.  If you have issues with adopting any of the above, then be sure you are going to Fail !!!